Page 2 of 2

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Mon Sep 26, 2016 4:42 pm
by Octal450
The 7478 of tikibar flies unrealistically. First note is absence of FBW. Tikibar is redoing the FDM soon, then it will be very nice.

The best are:
777 Seattle (best in FG) 130kts Flap 30
MD-11 tikibar/it0uchpods (much improved, very good FDM) 152kts Flap 35
767-300 tikibar/other (nice to fly) 134kts Flap 30
A330-200 artix (nice FBW) 138kts Flap 4

My preference.

Josh

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:27 am
by CaptainFG
Just did it with the 77W in foggy conditions
http://imgur.com/a/G1ZpF
Next gonna do the MD11 and A332
Also livery is already pushed to FGmembers

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 11:37 am
by KL-666
it0uchpods wrote:The 7478 of tikibar flies unrealistically. First note is absence of FBW.


It flies great as a 747-200. And Boeings FBW is not changing much for the pilots anyway.

Kind regards, Vincent

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:35 pm
by Octal450
I disagree. The landing speeds and confit are wrong. Also wrong is the pitch is too sensitive.

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:38 am
by KL-666
I enjoy eating confit the canard very much, but i really do not need the contents of the galley ovens modeled to fly the plane. So i think you mean something else?

Sensitivity depends on many factors, like the type of stick you use and the stick sensitivity settings in flightgear. What seems sensitive to you may feel sluggish to someone with another stick and settings. Making it difficult to make objective statements about sensitivity.

Kind regards, Vincent

Re: A380 at VHSK

Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2016 2:01 pm
by Octal450
It's to sensitive pitch axis with keyboard also Compared to the other heavies.