Re: SHM has been finally banned
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2016 6:23 pm
I haven't even seen StarWars
An independent forum for FlightGear users and developers
https://www.thejabberwocky.net/
legoboyvdlp wrote:@SHM, a fork is not the way ahead. Firstly, it further splits the community. Secondly, I don't know any C++, and I don't think anyone else does Finally, it makes us look even worse... like the other scammers.
Firstly, it further splits the community.
I don't know any C++, and I don't think anyone else does
Finally, it makes us look even worse... like the other scammers
.. 411it0uchpods wrote:What the fuck
legoboyvdlp wrote:@SHM, a fork is not the way ahead. Firstly, it further splits the community. Secondly, I don't know any C++, and I don't think anyone else does Finally, it makes us look even worse... like the other scammers.
SHM wrote:I haven't even seen StarWars
Lydiot wrote:But you've seen "Home Alone"??? Say it ain't so....
Catalanoic on the Devel.List wrote:I don't know where to report it, but the official main website of
fligthgear has been hacked.
Hope the admins can solve it.
Catalanoic,
Curtis on the Devel.List wrote:I'm not seeing anything out of the ordinary here, what are you seeing?
Thanks,
Curt.
Catalanoic on the devel list wrote:Its not accesible, just loading all the time for me.
Alan Teeder on the Devel.List wrote:http://www.flightgear.org/
I get this in Portugal:-
The connection has timed out
The server at http://www.flightgear.org is taking too long to respond.
The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments
Alan
Curtis on the Devel.List wrote:Support says evidence of a denial of service style attack.
Curtis on the Devel.List wrote:Perhaps it's another parting message from the user we had to ban on the
forum earlier today. He claimed he was a master of dynamic IP addresses,
registered himself a new account, and said we'd never be able to stop him.
Then he posted a nice message sharing his true thoughts about flightgear,
the forum, and the forum admins, which he was kind enough to summarize on
the other forum (although not precisely the same message, his summary
conveyed similar meaning). But there is no direct connecting evidence to
the DOS attack. Perhaps it's purely coincidence that we'd see a DOS
attempt on the main flightgear server later the same day. The dots are
certainly close together, even though we don't have direct evidence to
connect them. When stuff like this happens, the first question to ask is
who would want to do this, and who would be capable of doing this? Often
that narrows the pool of suspects down pretty substantially. Or it could
be totally random ... that happens too sometimes.