Nasty Piece of Work

The Club of all those banned or deleted form the "official" FlightGear forum for speaking out political inconvenient truths or just things, the rulers over there didn't want to hear.
bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Nasty Piece of Work

Postby bomber » Fri May 20, 2016 4:30 pm

https://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic. ... &start=240

In fact, I have seen PMs where Jabberwocky admitted to other users in private that he was publicly disagreeing, and debating, with Thorsten or me despite knowing exactly that we were right, because he simply enjoyed the debate, i.e. for the sake of having the argument, and fully well knowing that he was wasting our time, feeling that he was "protecting" others while "dealing" with us.

I think you could say that Thorsten and I are rather seasoned debaters around here, but that thought never occurred to us - and it changed the way we perceived him, and the way we dealt with him.


Regardless of the rights or wrongs of this tactic by Jabberwocky..

Look at that first sentance...
I have seen PMs where Jabberwocky admitted to other users in private


When any of you is accused of posting a private email on this forum, remember this post as an example where those 'seasoned debaters' on FG's forum are looking at your private messages.

Now it might be that Jabberwocky was betrayed by a person he privately posted too... but it could also be an example of abuse of board privalages by either the admin or moderator trawling through a person's private communication once they've been banned.

Either way to actually admit to reading someone elses private communications and then use it as a weapon against them within a discussion/debate/argument is dispicable.

Be aware, there are some seriously nasty pieces of work out there

Simon
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

User avatar
IAHM-COL
Posts: 6409
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 3:43 pm
Location: Homey, NV (KXTA) - U.S.A
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby IAHM-COL » Fri May 20, 2016 5:17 pm

bomber wrote:Look at that first sentance...
I have seen PMs where Jabberwocky admitted to other users in private


When any of you is accused of posting a private email on this forum, remember this post as an example where those 'seasoned debaters' on FG's forum are looking at your private messages.

Now it might be that Jabberwocky was betrayed by a person he privately posted too... but it could also be an example of abuse of board privalages by either the admin or moderator trawling through a person's private communication once they've been banned.

Either way to actually admit to reading someone elses private communications and then use it as a weapon against them within a discussion/debate/argument is dispicable.

Be aware, there are some seriously nasty pieces of work out there

Simon


Hi Bomber,
That's lamentably, what they mean by this:

http://www.flightgear.org/flightgear-policy-document/
The FlightGear project operates as a meritocracy on the principles of politeness, respect, trust and humility.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/IAHM-COL/gpg-pubkey/master/pubkey.asc

R.M.S.
If we gave everybody in the World free software today, but we failed to teach them about the four freedoms, five years from now, would they still have it?

KL-666
Posts: 1610
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:42 am

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby KL-666 » Fri May 20, 2016 5:57 pm

Oh, in my work i see it so often that little brats do not (want to) know their code of honour as admin, and sift through management documents. Generally they have no good career anymore after being caught. I always advice people to encrypt documents themselves, if they are absolutely not meant to be seen by these little criminals, who smudge the whole profession.

So what are the chances it happened here? I deem them very high. Can it be proven? Probably. If Jwocky has sent something like this, and he can remember to whom, then he can determine the likelihood of that person forwarding it to Hooray or one of his friends. Also i find that now Hooray has laden suspicion of high probability on him by publishing out of the PM's, he has an obligation to produce his alibi that he did not get it via a criminal road. For that he can produce the original forwarding to him or one of his friends.

Kind regards, Vincent

User avatar
N3266G
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:20 am
Location: Some Alternate Universe.
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby N3266G » Fri May 20, 2016 6:20 pm

Just goes to show what tyrants are on the official forum. Discusting
Image Image

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby jwocky » Fri May 20, 2016 7:07 pm

Well, I would actually like to see those emails. What I wrote once to another user was "I should let it go, but it was so fun to show off that idiot!"
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!

bomber
Posts: 1379
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby bomber » Fri May 20, 2016 7:11 pm

If that's all you wrote..... that's some hell of a lot of embellishment
"If anyone ever tells you anything about an aeroplane which is so bloody complicated you can't understand it, take it from me - it's all balls" - R J Mitchell

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby jwocky » Fri May 20, 2016 7:13 pm

You see, people know

- I never forget
- I never flinch

So, at the moment, I am a little tamer than usual because I am busy
Food for thought: What could happen if I have more time?
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!

User avatar
N3266G
Posts: 252
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2015 12:20 am
Location: Some Alternate Universe.
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby N3266G » Fri May 20, 2016 7:16 pm

Who knows.

But it is a scary thought of what you could do with a year's worth of spare time on your hands jwocky.
Image Image

KL-666
Posts: 1610
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 8:42 am

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby KL-666 » Fri May 20, 2016 7:22 pm

Jwocky, i do not care about embellishments. The issue is: Can you exclusively identify a PM that could have been used for this embellishment, and remember to whom you sent it? If the likelihood of that person to have forwarded it is 0, then they hang.

Kind regards, Vincent

User avatar
jwocky
Site Admin
Posts: 1833
Joined: Sat Sep 12, 2015 12:04 pm
Contact:

Re: Nasty Piece of Work

Postby jwocky » Fri May 20, 2016 7:29 pm

Well, it was long ago and the person isn't there for some time anymore. So ... I don't think, they really refer to that one unless someone scavenged the PM folders of absent user by abusing some kind of administration right. That would go far beyond what a normal moderator can do.
Free speech can never be achieved by dictatorial measures!


Return to “Club of the Banned”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests