Free Flight, Free Speech

I am loosing context here. Which hostile is BS?

Kind regards, Vincent

@KL-666
I cannot believe that they think FGMEMBERS are hostile. That is bullshit.

Lolololol, Josh, language! I can see why you shake your head and can't believe it, but still ..

FGMEMBERS is hostile to their political goal, it makes all their attempts to gatekeep and reject plane work of other people who are not their friends hopeless.

it0uchpods wrote:@Thorsten
Thank you for wasting 2 minutes of mine time.

@all including main devs and FGMEMBERS
Why even is there an argument! Both sides should just stop attacking each other and then the problem is solved. Each side keeps poking each other, and then getting mad at being poked. Nothing will ever change from this! Just everyone go their own ways, so we won't have such stupid arguments.

Think of it like Linux and Windows. The philosophies of the two OS is different, but I do not see Microsoft saying: Linux is a hostile group trying to take away our customers, and vice versera. Same applies here. The main developers just leave each other alone, FGMEMBERS leaves you alone. Let the users decide what they want to use. And since its all GPL, its not like you can change anything now anyways. So all this people making arguments, just stop! Leave each other alone, so we all can use a simulator without fighting.

Do something smart for once. Not stupid.

I'm done.

My little response to the whole thing.

Regards,

Thorsten wrote:Edit: I've just been informed via a message that my comment here might be seen as a personal attack - if that is indeed the case, that hasn't been my intention at all and I apologize if it was perceived as such.

So Thorsten goes away just like that while I get issued a board warning.

@SHM
Well, his "attack" is very very minor.

Do you really think that is why?

This was what I posted. But come on who doesn't get tired of Thorsten's usual saying "GPL VIOLATION". lol

Very nice idea it0uchpods, but i doubt if it will work. Just above your statement Thorsten has put away the minds of a whole group of people based on one statement. This begs for correction, as he might mean my mind too.

Edward states the point of FGMembers would be to replace infrastructure (i.e. he makes an assertion of something). He backs this up by e.g. linking a statement of JW talking about 'slaughter' of FGAddon (i.e. he backs his claim by evidence).

http://forum.flightgear.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=29598&p=285858#p285855

Then he goes on about "The rules of a rational debate", making this BS look very scientifically sound. I'll explain the BS:

"the point of FGMembers" means he is talking about peoples thoughts. The thoughts of a person is a big complex thing. The thoughts of many people are an even more big thing. Now he bases his verdict that a group of people think some same thing on one little word. The size of the evidence is never nowhere near the size of the accusation. In advanced judicial systems such a case never even makes it to court, due to lack of evidence. Besides that, people are not convicted for their thoughts.

Yet we know (semi) dictatorships like China and North Korea, where such flimsy evidence is used to put people away. My best guess is that Thorsten wants to prove Jwocky's point that he works under a dictatorship.

Kind regards, Vincent

@KL-666
I guess we will find out soon enough, the truth ALWAYS comes out.